Tested as working in: VyOS 1.5-rolling-202404190019
- Feed Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Feed Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Apr 20 2024
Apr 19 2024
And do you have similar setup and situation in newer version?
This is the result of buster-backports being removed from the main repository server: https://backports.debian.org/news/Removal_of_buster-backports_from_the_debian_archive/
In T5153#184332, @n.fort wrote:Output seems to be for VyOS 1.3, rather than 1.5
Can you show VyOS version @PeppyH ?
Apr 18 2024
Hi,
I was playing around with VyOS and thought i'd build myself an iso and hit this issue. Not sure if its the correct way to solve it, but this is what I did:
This will be resolved after backport of T5996.
Output seems to be for VyOS 1.3, rather than 1.5
Can you show VyOS version @PeppyH ?
Test addresses have to be different
Provide the set of the commands to reproduce
The old implementation used this script and https://github.com/vyos/vyatta-conntrack/blob/current/src/vyatta-conntrack-logging.c for the logging and it seems not impelemted for the current
At least there is not mention of the log
Without subtasks, it is going to be dead.
@Apachez It is not clear what you want to fix exactly. Fix all and do all working well could be related to any task.
Not reproduced on VyOS 1.5-rolling-202404141045
vyos@r-left# set pki ca "my test ca name" certificate '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'
@dotAndy Is it still relevant?
Can you create a PR?
@SquirePug re-check please with the latest rolling image.
@jmaslak can you check the latest rolling image?
@kroy can you re-test this case?
Closed invalid - this is done with nftables now.
It would be handy if the GARP announcement wouldnt be a separate list but rather picked up from any DNAT or SNAT rules.
Probably related:
In T6247#184232, @jmoore wrote:. We need the feature regardless of the state of the repository.