@sarthurdev and need to be in 1.4?

@sarthurdev, does this require backporting?

@Viacheslav @dmbaturin need to be fixed in 1.4.1

@rob, we may need a bit of help with this from you

For support requests, use forum.vyos.io

Use forum.vyos.io for support requests

Maybe ask the author to resubmit against the current?

@evgmol can you please review the pull request provided, if ok we should merge it

DHCP option 66 is not intended to carry an HTTP URL. According to RFC 2132, option 66 is specifically designed to provide the TFTP (Trivial File Transfer Protocol) server name, typically used to specify a hostname or IP address of a server from which the client can download a boot file via TFTP, not HTTP.

can be ipv4 or hostname

This is not a bug, this is according to RFC
@Apachez I recall you have cited it but do not recall where it was here or at the forum

Hey @insignia96
Give it a try and come back if you have questions or doubts
@Viacheslav @dmbaturin can you take a look and suggest if the approach suggested by @insignia96 is ok?

Thanks for bringing this to our attention @paulywog

@Viacheslav, does this require a backport?

@MPStudyly thanks for spotting this
merged in as duplicate

Good luck with migration to Alpine and own fork of Accel PPP, finally you will show us how true open source should be done

Source is at https://github.com/vyos
Project around for 11 years but instead of participating, you decided you were smarter than everybody else and would abuse subscriptions for home users to run your business.
When we cut of people like you, instead of joining our efforts, you again decided you were smarter, you wanted per GPL, and now it will be per GPL
Not even to mention your shit-talking about Team and me. Go elsewhere, you are not welcome here

Nobody cares what you need @marekm

@Apachez i think we need to add status Implemented for feature request it makes more sense
and for bugs mark them as resolved