PR https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/2294

You do not use port 80/443, so it does not have HTTP-HEADER (in theory).

service LB_port_451 {
    listen-address 10.1.1.1
    mode tcp
    port 451

Try to change to port 80 and check if it works.
You need another solution/configuration

Some highly unscientific tests (only did 3 reboots of each to rule out that any uncached data at the host would affect the result since I run this in a VM through VirtualBox 7.0) shows a difference of up to 2.1% improvment when having a config with 200 static routes.

Parent task is completed - Bugs will get their own subtask and linked to this parent if possible.

This should fix the hostname issue reported to BGP neighbors: https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/2289

In T4502#160404, @Apachez wrote:

Perhaps a possible way to detect if the nic supports hardware flowtables or not.

Try to set sudo ethtool -K eth0 hw-tc-offload on.

If the result becomes:

Actual changes:
hw-tc-offload: off [requested on]
Could not change any device features

Then it doesnt support hardware flowtables.

Could also verify by reading the capability like so:

$ ethtool -k eth0 | grep hw-tc-offload
hw-tc-offload: off [fixed]

Perhaps a possible way to detect if the nic supports hardware flowtables or not.

Some feedback from the #netfilter channel over at libera.chat:

I got some funny results which I hope somebody else (with a faster cpu) are able to verify?

First tests unsecseful

PR https://github.com/vyos/vyos-build/pull/416

Im guessing that what this task complains about has a huge part of the time it takes to complete smoketests.

PR updated (again): https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/2280

Hello @sdev Sorry to bother you. The issue hasn't been fixed in the recent rolling release: VyOS 1.5-rolling-202309170024

PR updated: https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/2280

PR: https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/2283

In T5586#160073, @Apachez wrote:

How does FRR/vrrpd work regarding SNMP compatability?

Im thinking if the keepalived could be replaced in favour of FRR/vrrpd?

And for now keep keepalived around only for virtual-server (unless that too can be dealt with by FRR/vrrpd)?

PR for latest: https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/2281
PR for Equuleus: https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/2282

PR created: https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/2280

I will put this as "wontfix" because a fix would need additional work of stopping/starting correct FRR-service (if this occurs in future then this task can be reopened).

I will close this task as a duplicate of https://vyos.dev/T4502 where work is in progress.

Using VyOS 1.5-rolling-202309170024.