Thank you for your contribution
I fixed and approved it and left some comments for any future PRs

I will help formatting the PR if anything, dont woryy

You are right - Public task first, then PR with the T task reference

Thanks,
yes, usually if you have a fix - you fork the vyos.vyos, branch it, implement the fix and raise a PR that VyOS Gurus review and make it merge at some point.
Alternatively, you submit a bug or feature request, and other collaborators can try and implement it.

@mson thanks for submitting this?
You mentioned a fix - is there a PR for this, or you want someone to look into this and fix, please?

Won't do as the requested feature is in netcommon and more advanced. I see no point in re-creating it specifically in this collection

It seems we may need the both features: the one requested by this ticket, and the one that also allows for configuration in a form of flat, 'set/delete' commands?

https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/495

Are you able to elaborate, @Apachez?

https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/493 - yet another attempt

https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/491

This includes but not limited to:

1. Updating the CI workflows
2. Troubleshooting the upstream provider changes
3. Fixing failing tests
4. Assisting contributors with their PRs, reviewing their PRs
5. Updating branches

@RubenNL thanks for looking into this
I believe the module is misused, that is why the result is not as expected.

fixed in https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/420

Fixed by https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/439

Hi @syncer @sever and @dmbaturin !
Can we discuss the need in this feature.
JunOS has never implemented it (despite the PR above), yet vyos.vyos seems to use ActonNetworkModule from netcommon Galaxy collection - it is maintained, patched and works well.
Having own action plugin will mean we will need to build it separately and maintain to meet Ansible version.

https://internal.confluence.vyos.com/wiki/x/HYBRPg

There will likely be at least two modules - for global parameters and tunnel

https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/487

That is the test case bug introduced by PR 466
I will create a separate fix to the tests

Thank you for the clarification.

Hi @mihakralj
Is it worth working on this given the community driven projects you mentioned?
I am learning MCP and deployment framework for them, and I am happy to help - as my learning effort

New repository with PRs is here https://github.com/vyos/rest.vyos

This reads a a core feature request, not exactly to do with Ansible Galaxy collection.
We can look into this from automation perspective once this feature is supported by the product

AI review revealed a bug when with ACTION state, the module also removes L2 configuration.
A module fix is required as such

1st, July, 2026: Contributor assistance is failing:

https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/486

This task is covered by https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/438

@GideonKuijt @gaige
Netcommon v8.4.0 seems to be free of this issue - kindly check for yourself and advise

https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/449

It is likely extension to vyos.vyos.vyos_l3_interface module

@SrividyaA hi!

Hi @RubenNL
Do you plan to work on this one or you are OK to delegate / re-assign?
You mentioned a PR - can you please advise the number

https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/409 merged - closing this off

I see you created this ticket and self-assigned to.
Do you plan to work on the bugfix or you are OK to delegate?

https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/445

https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/408