User Details
- User Since
- Oct 25 2024, 9:10 PM (102 w, 1 d)
Yesterday
Thu, Oct 8
Wed, Oct 7
Delivered
Sun, Oct 4
https://internal.confluence.vyos.com/wiki/x/HIDeSw # for rest.vyos
Thu, Oct 1
Fri, Sep 18
Thu, Sep 17
Tue, Sep 15
Sun, Sep 13
Fri, Sep 11
Sep 8 2026
Thank you for your contribution
I fixed and approved it and left some comments for any future PRs
Sep 1 2026
Aug 29 2026
I will help formatting the PR if anything, dont woryy
You are right - Public task first, then PR with the T task reference
Thanks,
yes, usually if you have a fix - you fork the vyos.vyos, branch it, implement the fix and raise a PR that VyOS Gurus review and make it merge at some point.
Alternatively, you submit a bug or feature request, and other collaborators can try and implement it.
@mson thanks for submitting this!
You mentioned a fix - is there a PR for this, or you want someone to look into this and fix, please?
Aug 28 2026
Won't do as the requested feature is in netcommon and more advanced. I see no point in re-creating it specifically in this collection
Aug 26 2026
Aug 20 2026
It seems we may need the both features: the one requested by this ticket, and the one that also allows for configuration in a form of flat, 'set/delete' commands?
Aug 19 2026
Aug 10 2026
Aug 9 2026
Are you able to elaborate, @Apachez?
Aug 8 2026
https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/493 - yet another attempt
Aug 2 2026
Jul 31 2026
This includes but not limited to:
- Updating the CI workflows
- Troubleshooting the upstream provider changes
- Fixing failing tests
- Assisting contributors with their PRs, reviewing their PRs
- Updating branches
Jul 27 2026
@RubenNL thanks for looking into this
I believe the module is misused, that is why the result is not as expected.
Jul 26 2026
Hi @syncer @sever and @dmbaturin !
Can we discuss the need in this feature.
JunOS has never implemented it (despite the PR above), yet vyos.vyos seems to use ActonNetworkModule from netcommon Galaxy collection - it is maintained, patched and works well.
Having own action plugin will mean we will need to build it separately and maintain to meet Ansible version.
Jul 17 2026
Jul 14 2026
There will likely be at least two modules - for global parameters and tunnel
Jul 6 2026
That is the test case bug introduced by PR 466
I will create a separate fix to the tests
Jul 5 2026
Jul 4 2026
Thank you for the clarification.
Jul 1 2026
Hi @mihakralj
Is it worth working on this given the community driven projects you mentioned?
I am learning MCP and deployment framework for them, and I am happy to help - as my learning effort
New repository with PRs is here https://github.com/vyos/rest.vyos
Jun 30 2026
This reads a a core feature request, not exactly to do with Ansible Galaxy collection.
We can look into this from automation perspective once this feature is supported by the product
AI review revealed a bug when with ACTION state, the module also removes L2 configuration.
A module fix is required as such
1st, July, 2026: Contributor assistance is failing: