The following adds support into the XML generation but I have no clue about vyatta-cfg how those files get executed.
- Feed Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Feed Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
May 1 2020
Presumably a val_help line in the op-mode node.def, too
Tested good - migrating traceroute now
Apr 30 2020
On boot, the existing config file is committed.
Right. In my opinion it would be necessary to change that.
Definition of effective is here:
Enhancement created.
Question to ISC submitted (https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/-/issues/104)
@ddiguru
I confirm all the issues that you have observed. I was able to reproduce them in the both our LTS and currect rolling releases.
- Issue with a wrong giaddr address. This sounds like a bug in the isc-dhp-relay package. Fortunately, those extra packets with a wrong giaddr address could be eliminated in newer versions by using "-id" and "-iu" instead of muliple "-i" options. isc-dhcp-relay allows for this since v4.3.5. I will create a Feature Request to modify the VyOS config syntax and isc-dhcp-relay config file accordingly. In the meantime I will try to confirm with ISC people that this indeed is a bug.
- Issue with duplicate packets. isc-dhp-relay seems to unnecessarily relay unicast packets (I have no idea why it does so). That's why you see all unicast packets doubled. Looks like another bug :) The good news is that it is more cosmetic issue. I already submitted the ticket for it (https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/-/issues/102)
This PR should address this simple usability enhancement
Apr 29 2020
I found that it was due to set_vrf which uses the same master/nomaster commands that bridge uses. I'm adding checks and conditions to all interfaces to prevent that - raise ConfigError if both are set, and only set_vrf if vrf is set. The prior idea I had with re-adding the interface to the bridge at the end isn't necessary in this case, but for other interface types, where the interface itself is deleted and recreated, re-adding it is still necessary. The PR should be ready for initial review tomorrow.
Resolved with T2393
This has a dependency on python3-flask-restx, which will need to be added using, for example, T2396.
Apr 28 2020
This is solved in both the current LTS and rolling releases.
I had already reported before my refactor of the code that DHCPv6 does not work.
https://phabricator.vyos.net/T2268
Marek Isalski Today at 6:31 PM
We've got full IPv4 and IPv6 routing tables on our VyOS boxes, and we *definitely* needed to increase net.ipv6.route.max_size (we picked 256k to give us some headroom).
Some statistics from ipv6 bgp summary