Linux tries to bind SSHd to the VRF but it is yet not ready. After restarting SSH to often (rate-limiting) it is blocked.

Oddly enough, whether I change the service settings or change the default settings of systemd, there are problems.

@c-po The problem was found when upgrading to the latest version, and the reason is not clear.

PPPoE is configured as follows (account password is hidden):

I want to do it and have to re explore the cause of the failure, but I haven't found out why dhcp6c can't start, I have to start it manually.

Changing the systemd defaults is a thing I hesitate to do! It will have a ton of unexpected sideeffects. I guess you have an error in your entire setup as multiple sites of mine work flawlessly

Strange, I found that this service may not have been started at all!

for me it looks like a name lookup error. I have read the forum entry mentioned above. And they fixed it by disabling name lookup.

I found that I had disable-host-validation configured and as soon as I removed it it happened to me, too. Changing task priority.

I have checked with a v4/v6 full table router and VyOS 1.2.5 - each SSH session will consume 7MiB which semms okay for me.

Availible in keepalived, thus kt could be considered for 1.3

This also has a measurable impact on CPU. You can tell exactly when I applied the nsswitch.conf fix.

Oh, in a system like vyos, SSH memory leak appears to be relatively serious. If there is a solution, it should be handled first

To add to this, this link pointed me at the correct solution:

PR https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/487 with changed CLI to service ids ddos-protection.

@elianora Email me at david@summersoft.fay-ar.us

Again, please always attach a configuration file

At the request of @c-po, going to mention that this may have relevance to T2653 since the order of how interfaces are handled may be effected by this and/or the proposal here may make sense to change based on their work.

I use myself a "cleanup" function, imagine:

In T2674#69525, @jack9603301 wrote:

I wish you success in advance. Porting and compiling has always been a large-scale application project, which may take a lot of time. However, in addition to rewriting and porting related code to a more portable language, we can also try to transplant and cross build the existing old code first. Of course, this is only the first step. If possible, porting the code base has made it easier for the code base to be transplanted Meaningful.

As "ip" is an invalid key in "vif" (as its no VLAN number) it should not be part of the default dict I guess - same for vif_s

There are allready someone trying to make a guide for building vyos on arm and the pi3/4, i myself have made it work on the pi4 some time ago but did not save my work so i dont have all the steps to reproduce..

I wish you success in advance. Porting and compiling has always been a large-scale application project, which may take a lot of time. However, in addition to rewriting and porting related code to a more portable language, we can also try to transplant and cross build the existing old code first. Of course, this is only the first step. If possible, porting the code base has made it easier for the code base to be transplanted Meaningful.

Yes, I'm interested in actually helping on porting it as it would make my ER-X for one, a lot more fun and useful.

porting half of an operating system to a different architecture is far from easy. Right now VyOS still has a lot of the old Vyatta codebase in it. As we are more and more in the process of migrating this to a Python based codebase it will still take some time. To be fair I stater a project some time back to port VyOS on an EdgeROuterPro (https://github.com/c-po/vy-project) and at least "it booted" but I then switched my focus to VyOS first - so by migrating th ecodebase to our own vyos-1x based Python implementation it will become easier in the future to port it to other operating systems as there is less code, less packages to port.

@c-po When this problem occurred, I might be testing bridge. I didn't expect that my test would make the bridge enter the admin down state without any warning. Later, when I restart, I found that SNMP seemed to be normal. This problem can be temporarily switched to invalid. Please refer to T2673

As always, please provide your config and probably a way to reproducs.

EDIT 1: Removing comment after speaking with cpo, I apologize for the confusion

I found that this problem may be related to T2673

Please open a new ticket or move your comment to an appropriate ticket, this ticket is not discussing your consernes.

Also on delete:

Addressed by T2667.