Change Details

The `rollback-soft` feature was implemented in T5249. It is time to think of renaming the features; we currently have `rollback` (with reboot) and `rollback-soft` (without rebooting) - Proposed for renaming: ``` rollback => rollback-hard rollback-soft => rollback ``` I.e. after refactoring: ``` rollback Rollback to a prior config revision (without reboot) rollback-hard Rollback to a prior config revision (requires reboot) ``` - Another idea would be to get rid of the old `rollback` which requires a reboot. As it is completely useless. I think we can start with the first option.

The `rollback-soft` feature was implemented in T5249. It is time to think of renaming the features; we currently have `rollback` (with reboot) and `rollback-soft` (without rebooting) - Proposed for renaming: ``` rollback => rollback-hard rollback-soft => rollback ``` I.e. after refactoring: ``` rollback Rollback to a prior config revision (without reboot) rollback-hard Rollback to a prior config revision (requires reboot) ``` - Another idea would be to get rid of the old `rollback` which requires a reboot. As it is completely useless. I think we can start with the first option.

The `rollback-soft` feature was implemented in T5249. It is time to think of renaming the features; we currently have `rollback` (with reboot) and `rollback-soft` (without rebooting) - Proposed for renaming: ``` rollback => rollback-hard rollback-soft => rollback ``` I.e. after refactoring: ``` rollback Rollback to a prior config revision (without reboot) rollback-hard Rollback to a prior config revision (requires reboot) ``` - Another idea would be to get rid of the old `rollback` which requires a reboot. As it is completely useless. I think we can start with the first option.