User Details
- User Since
- Sep 4 2017, 4:30 PM (430 w, 4 d)
Mon, Nov 10
Oct 16 2025
Thanks for analysis and confirmation.
Oct 10 2025
show configuration commands | grep 'set firewall ipv6 name'
Oct 9 2025
ip -6 maddr show dev tun2
Kernel IPv6 routing table Destination Next Hop Flag Met Ref Use If 2001:67c:21ec:4010::/64 :: U 256 1 0 tun2 2001:67c:21ec:41d0::/64 :: U 256 2 0 tun3 2001:67c:21ec:9999::9/128 :: !n 256 3 0 lo 2a0f:5707:ba01:1000::/64 :: U 256 2 0 eth1 fe80::/64 :: !n 256 1 0 lo fe80::/64 :: U 256 1 0 eth0 fe80::/64 :: U 256 2 0 eth1 fe80::/64 :: U 256 1 0 tun3 fe80::/64 :: U 256 1 0 tun2 ::/0 :: !n -1 1 0 lo ::1/128 :: Un 0 4 0 lo 2001:67c:21ec:4010::/128 :: Un 0 3 0 tun2 2001:67c:21ec:4010::1/128 :: Un 0 4 0 tun2 2001:67c:21ec:41d0::/128 :: Un 0 3 0 tun3 2001:67c:21ec:41d0::2/128 :: Un 0 5 0 tun3 2001:67c:21ec:9999::9/128 :: Un 0 4 0 lo 2a0f:5707:ba01:1000::/128 :: Un 0 3 0 eth1 2a0f:5707:ba01:1000::1/128 :: Un 0 4 0 eth1 fe80::/128 :: Un 0 3 0 lo fe80::/128 :: Un 0 3 0 eth0 fe80::/128 :: Un 0 3 0 tun3 fe80::/128 :: Un 0 3 0 tun2 fe80::/128 :: Un 0 3 0 eth1 fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/128 :: Un 0 6 0 lo fe80::20c:29ff:fe25:cfc1/128 :: Un 0 3 0 eth0 fe80::20c:29ff:fe25:cfcb/128 :: Un 0 3 0 eth1 fe80::f405:63ff:fef9:9799/128 :: Un 0 2 0 tun2 fe80::f88f:fcff:feb2:2d3d/128 :: Un 0 3 0 tun3 ff00::/8 :: U 256 1 0 eth0 ff00::/8 :: U 256 3 0 eth1 ::/0 :: !n -1 1 0 lo
Sep 1 2025
ip -6 r s ff00::/8
ff00::/8 nhid 19 proto static metric 20 pref medium
nexthop dev tun3 weight 1 nexthop dev tun2 weight 1
Finally VyOS-style static route help:
Both tunnel have multicast enabled:
Manually adding route:
ip -6 r a ff00::/8 dev tun2
Oct 15 2024
I've checked on 1.4.0 and BGP session is stable
Jan 24 2022
Sep 9 2017
I think that best way to implement it, will be use a "extends" in snmpd for BGP4-V2-MIB-JUNIPER and use a vtysh as backed.
Sep 4 2017
There is another problem. BGP4-MIB doen't cover IPv6 peers, the clue is implement a new MIB like https://iphostmonitor.com/mib/BGP4-V2-MIB-JUNIPER.html like Juniper did
I have access to to these routers, is VyOS like below will be ok?
vyos@vyos:~$ show version
Version: VyOS 1.1.7
Description: VyOS 1.1.7 (helium)
I'm also really intereseted to make it working, is there any chance to help?