Being worked
- Feed Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Feed Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Dec 28 2024
Dec 27 2024
Dec 22 2024
Dec 18 2024
Duplicate of existing PR
Duplicate of T6892
Raised a Draft PR https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/368
Dec 17 2024
Fixed for 1.3+ along with test verifications
Dec 16 2024
I was looking into this again today. As I mentioned in the pull request, there is an issue with the draft PR. What happens is that the current config is retrieved using the command show configuration commands instead of show configuration. The output does not contain any less specific config paths, as they would be useless in configuring a system. However, when determining what to delete, this information is essential.
Dec 13 2024
The fix is now a part of https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/367
Dec 11 2024
the PR to fix this is https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/367
The PR tp fix this https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/367
Nov 29 2024
Implemented for the next 1.4.1
@a.apostoliuk recheck please and close if works as expected
Nov 26 2024
The PR# is re-submitted for review and testing
Nov 24 2024
Path issues and unit tests resolved
Nov 22 2024
Nov 20 2024
Per slack, this is being investigated for re-introduction into 1.4.1. Putting this on pause for now.
It appears that path-limit GBP network options is deprecated
@Viacheslav @dmbaturin need to be fixed in 1.4.1
Confirmed this is happening with current mainline and 1.4, but not 1.2,1.3 or 1.5.
Nov 19 2024
Maybe it will be fixed after merging https://vyos.dev/T6045
I did some investigation - apparently the plugin cannot match the full command pattern (including optional attributes) and silently refuses to generate a resultant set of commands - I will be looking into this - most likely the issue is related to rm_templates regex patterns for getval
Nov 18 2024
Per slack conversation.
This should be fixed by
@sdwilsh Are you good to close this out? The change in ipv6 should be handled by the updated version now in main
Nov 17 2024
@rob, we may need a bit of help with this from you
I was looking for this too, and actually started to play with the code of the module to get this feature in a few weeks ago. I've submitted my changes as a draft PR on Github. I've been playing with managing my VyOS config from SCM for my home lab. It's important when I for example remove a firewall rule, it is also deleted in the running config, instead of being orphaned. It seems to work pretty well in my setup, but I am uncertain if nothing breaks in other workflows.
Nov 16 2024
Ready for review.
I've got a fix for this in the works.
Nov 15 2024
I'm back home now, feel free to send them to me and I'll take a look at it today (I have a few minutes now, but likely will need to look at it in about 12 hours).
Update - I cloned the current vyo.vyos changes, created a branch and made the changes that Maxime proposed.
sure, ok - I will do needful for it to be tests ready
It does not appear a huge change to me
Maybe ask the author to resubmit against the current?
I believe it was forked a while ago (in March this year) and never refreshed after that - so the fork (and PK) is using older version of the repo
was that after rebasing it onto our current main branch or applying changes directly? Or something else?
Nov 14 2024
Sanity tests are failing pretty much all:
FATAL: The 5 sanity test(s) listed below (out of 34) failed. See error output above for details.
action-plugin-docs
import --python 3.12
pep8
pylint
validate-modules
Yeah, changes are pretty small and also pretty isolated. I’m guessing the merge might be fast, unless there are significant conflicts. However if there are conflicts probably faster to re-apply the change.
Or I may just re-introduce the changes into the working current branch given they are all straight forward
Started to look into this - but it seems to be based on older version of collection (57 commits behind) and failing all the sanity checks.
I will try and refresh that branch and re-test
On it, @syncer
Let’s get tests at least for the changes here before we check it in. It should be trivial to test, especially since it looks like there is no version difference to take into account.
@evgmol can you please review the pull request provided, if ok we should merge it
Nov 13 2024
I raised a draft PR (https://github.com/vyos/vyos.vyos/pull/357) to tackle some of the compatibility issues. I will try and finalise it in coming days