It can be fixed in thoses PR's:
https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/1210
https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/1211
T4230
- Feed Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Feed Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feb 9 2022
Feb 8 2022
Issue not resolved, re-open
For example, I have 300 routers in different timezones and I want to reboot 50% of routers via 1441min and the other 50% via 2881min
PR for 1.3 https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/1210
PR for 1.4 https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/1211
Ip address for openvpn is not yet assigned as a priority for OpenVPN less than for HA
460 interfaces/openvpn 800 high-availability
Anf we have checks if address assigned:
set interfaces ethernet eth0 address '10.1.12.1/24' set high-availability vrrp group FOO interface 'eth0' set high-availability vrrp group FOO no-preempt set high-availability vrrp group FOO priority '150' set high-availability vrrp group FOO rfc3768-compatibility set high-availability vrrp group FOO virtual-address '203.0.113.1/24' set high-availability vrrp group FOO vrid '10'
PR ability to get nftables counters, telegraf input plugin https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/1209
Feb 7 2022
Feb 5 2022
Feb 4 2022
@aohanian I got it, thanks, so it doesn't delete the previous route in one commit
it can be archived with 2 commits
configure delete protocols static route 1.1.1.1/32 dhcp-interface eth4 commit set protocols static route 1.1.1.1/32 dhcp-interface eth5 commit
@fernando What do you want to see it that case?
In the our CLI DHCP-route can be as a single value now:
set protocols static route 192.0.2.192/32 dhcp-interface 'eth0' set protocols static route 192.0.2.192/32 dhcp-interface 'eth2'
I.e. the first route will be replaced with the second route in CLI.
So if I understand correctly you expect that this route will be also replaced an in the FRR?
For 1.4 this feature was added in T2683
Fixed in 1.3
vyos@r4:~$ show interfaces counters Interface Rx Packets Rx Bytes Tx Packets Tx Bytes dum0 0 0 0 0 eth0 126 9952 76 10316 eth1 4 280 5 523 eth2 37 1924 0 0 lo 6 300 6 300 vyos@r4:~$ vyos@r4:~$ clear interfaces ethernet eth1 counters Clearing eth1 vyos@r4:~$ show interfaces counters Interface Rx Packets Rx Bytes Tx Packets Tx Bytes dum0 0 0 0 0 eth0 182 14550 108 14340 eth1 0 0 0 0 eth2 42 2184 0 0 lo 6 300 6 300 vyos@r4:~$
@jack9603301 Could you test it, also create a pr for the documentation?
Feb 3 2022
PR for op-mode https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/1204
Feb 2 2022
PR https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/1200
Fix for telegraf template/scripts for services.
Feb 1 2022
Is there any Linux implementation?
Jan 28 2022
Why is it 1-99?
If I want to reboot the router in 1500 min?
Jan 27 2022
Jan 26 2022
Incorrect behavior with multiple commits
Configuration:
set policy local-route rule 10 set table '101' set policy local-route rule 10 source '192.0.2.1' set policy local-route rule 10 source '192.0.2.2' commit set policy local-route rule 10 destination '203.0.113.25' commit
Expected rules:
10: from 192.0.2.1 to 203.0.113.25 lookup 101 10: from 192.0.2.2 to 203.0.113.25 lookup 101
Getting rules:
10: from 192.0.2.2 lookup 101 10: from 192.0.2.1 to 203.0.113.25 lookup 101 10: from 192.0.2.2 to 203.0.113.25 lookup 101
Jan 25 2022
Is it the same task T4138 ?
PR https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/1190
set policy prefix-list TST_PRF_LST rule 10 action 'permit' set policy prefix-list TST_PRF_LST rule 10 prefix '10.5.5.0/24' set policy prefix-list TST_PRF_LST rule 20 action 'permit' set policy prefix-list TST_PRF_LST rule 20 prefix '10.6.6.0/24' set policy prefix-list TST_PRF_LST rule 30 action 'permit' set policy prefix-list TST_PRF_LST rule 30 prefix '10.6.6.0/24'
Try to dump traffic from the required interface
For first do these changes as in commit
Try policy local route, for example:
set policy local-route rule 10 set table 111 set policy local-route rule 10 source 192.0.2.0/24
The main reason:
@Rhongomiant Am I understanding correctly that you don't see the default route in table 111?
@sdev Thanks
Jan 21 2022
@hensur Smoketest failed.
Jan 20 2022
@adestis Could you share commands, on how to reproduce this bug? Thanks.